Hybrid Vitrimer Model (HVM) – Literature Review & Equations¶
1. Key References¶
Primary papers for the HVM theoretical framework:¶
Vernerey, Long, & Brighenti (2017) “A statistically-based continuum theory for polymers with transient networks.” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 107, 1-20.
Introduces the distribution tensor framework for transient networks.
Eq. (8): Natural-state evolution (vitrimer hallmark).
Eq. (11): Stress as tensor difference sigma_E = G_E * (mu^E - mu^E_nat).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022509617301874
Meng, Saed, & Terentjev (2019) “Elasticity and Relaxation in Full and Partial Vitrimer Networks.” Macromolecules, 52, 7423-7429.
Develops continuum model for dynamic-mechanical response of vitrimers.
Introduces “partial vitrimer” concept: permanent sub-network + exchangeable sub-network.
Partial vitrimer in linear regime behaves as a Zener (SLS) model.
Eq. (3): k_BER = nu_0 * exp(-E_a / RT) (Arrhenius bond exchange rate).
Eq. (5): tau_v = 1/(2*k_BER) (vitrimer relaxation time with factor-of-2).
Meng, Saed, & Terentjev (2022) “Rheology of vitrimers.” Nature Communications, 13, 5753.
Full rheological characterization spanning small to large deformation.
Analytical expressions for Master Curves across 22 decades of frequency.
Treats partial vitrimers (permanent + exchangeable sub-networks).
Stukalin, Cai, Kumar, Leibler, & Rubinstein (2013) “Self-Healing of Unentangled Polymer Networks with Reversible Bonds.” Macromolecules, 46(18), 7525-7541.
Foundational transient network theory for reversible bonds.
Scaling theory for self-healing polymers.
Constitutive Modeling of Vitrimers Based on Transient Network Theory (2025) Macromolecules (recent).
Extends TNT to vitrimers and nanocomposites.
2. Physical Model: Three-Subnetwork Architecture¶
The HVM decomposes the polymer into three parallel subnetworks:
Subnetwork |
Symbol |
Bond Type |
Relaxation |
Behavior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanent (P) |
G_P |
Covalent crosslinks |
None (infinite) |
Neo-Hookean elastic |
Exchangeable (E) |
G_E |
Associative vitrimer bonds (BER) |
tau_E_eff = 1/(2*k_BER) |
Maxwell-like with evolving natural state |
Dissociative (D) |
G_D |
Physical/reversible bonds |
tau_D = 1/k_d^D |
Standard Maxwell |
Total stress:
sigma = sigma_P + sigma_E + sigma_D
3. Constitutive Equations¶
3.1 Stress Decomposition (General Tensorial Form)¶
Permanent network (neo-Hookean):
sigma_P = (1 - D) * G_P * (B - I)
where B is the left Cauchy-Green tensor, D is damage [0,1].
Exchangeable network (vitrimer hallmark):
sigma_E = G_E * (mu^E - mu^E_nat)
Stress depends on the difference between current distribution and its evolving natural state.
Dissociative network (standard Maxwell/VLB):
sigma_D = G_D * (mu^D - I)
3.2 Simple Shear Stress Components¶
sigma_P_xy = (1 - D) * G_P * gamma
sigma_E_xy = G_E * (mu^E_xy - mu^E_nat_xy)
sigma_D_xy = G_D * mu^D_xy
sigma_total = sigma_P_xy + sigma_E_xy + sigma_D_xy
3.3 Evolution ODEs (Simple Shear)¶
E-network distribution tensor (upper-convected + BER relaxation):
d(mu^E_xx)/dt = 2*gamma_dot*mu^E_xy + k_BER*(mu^E_nat_xx - mu^E_xx)
d(mu^E_yy)/dt = k_BER*(mu^E_nat_yy - mu^E_yy)
d(mu^E_xy)/dt = gamma_dot*mu^E_yy + k_BER*(mu^E_nat_xy - mu^E_xy)
E-network natural-state tensor (VITRIMER HALLMARK):
d(mu^E_nat_ij)/dt = k_BER * (mu^E_ij - mu^E_nat_ij)
The natural state continuously drifts toward the current state at rate k_BER. This is the key distinction from conventional transient networks (where natural state = I).
D-network distribution tensor (standard VLB):
d(mu^D_xx)/dt = 2*gamma_dot*mu^D_xy - k_d^D*(mu^D_xx - 1)
d(mu^D_yy)/dt = -k_d^D*(mu^D_yy - 1)
d(mu^D_xy)/dt = gamma_dot*mu^D_yy - k_d^D*mu^D_xy
3.4 Factor-of-2 in Relaxation¶
The stress difference Delta_mu_ij = mu^E_ij - mu^E_nat_ij satisfies:
d(Delta_mu_ij)/dt = -2 * k_BER * Delta_mu_ij
Both tensors relax toward each other at rate k_BER, so the difference (which determines stress) decays at 2*k_BER. Therefore:
tau_E_eff = 1 / (2 * k_BER_0)
4. Analytical Solutions (Linear Regime, Constant k_BER)¶
4.1 Storage and Loss Moduli (SAOS)¶
G'(omega) = G_P + G_E * (omega*tau_E)^2 / (1 + (omega*tau_E)^2)
+ G_D * (omega*tau_D)^2 / (1 + (omega*tau_D)^2)
G''(omega) = G_E * (omega*tau_E) / (1 + (omega*tau_E)^2)
+ G_D * (omega*tau_D) / (1 + (omega*tau_D)^2)
where:
tau_E = tau_E_eff = 1/(2*k_BER_0) (effective E-network relaxation time)
tau_D = 1/k_d^D (D-network relaxation time)
Physical interpretation:
G_P provides a frequency-independent elastic plateau (permanent crosslinks)
G_E contributes a Maxwell mode with the vitrimer relaxation time
G_D contributes a second Maxwell mode with the dissociative time
Limiting behavior:
omega -> 0: G’(0) = G_P, G’’(0) = 0
omega -> inf: G’(inf) = G_P + G_E + G_D
Loss peaks at omega = 1/tau_E and omega = 1/tau_D
4.2 Relaxation Modulus G(t)¶
G(t) = (1-D)*G_P + G_E*exp(-2*k_BER_0*t) + G_D*exp(-k_d^D*t)
= (1-D)*G_P + G_E*exp(-t/tau_E_eff) + G_D*exp(-t/tau_D)
Physical interpretation:
Permanent plateau (1-D)*G_P survives at all times
E-network decays exponentially with tau_E_eff = 1/(2*k_BER_0)
D-network decays exponentially with tau_D = 1/k_d^D
Initial value: G(0+) = G_P + G_E + G_D
Long-time value: G(inf) = G_P (or (1-D)*G_P with damage)
4.3 Startup Stress (Linear Regime, Constant Rate)¶
sigma(t) = G_P * gamma_dot * t
+ G_E * gamma_dot * tau_E * (1 - exp(-t/tau_E))
+ G_D * gamma_dot * tau_D * (1 - exp(-t/tau_D))
4.4 Steady-State Shear Stress (Flow Curve)¶
At steady state, the E-network fully relaxes (mu^E -> mu^E_nat, so sigma_E -> 0):
sigma_ss = eta_D * gamma_dot (viscous contribution only)
where eta_D = G_D / k_d^D.
Note: sigma_P = G_P * gamma grows unbounded under continuous shear (elastic storage).
4.5 Creep Compliance J(t)¶
J(t) = 1/G_tot + (G_E / (G_P * G_tot)) * (1 - exp(-t/tau_ret_E))
+ (G_D / (G_P * G_tot)) * (1 - exp(-t/tau_ret_D))
where:
G_tot = G_P + G_E + G_D
tau_ret_E = G_tot / (G_P * 2*k_BER_0) (E-network retardation time)
tau_ret_D = G_tot / (G_P * k_d^D) (D-network retardation time)
Limiting behavior:
J(0+) = 1/G_tot (instantaneous elastic compliance)
J(inf) = 1/G_P (long-time compliance set by permanent network)
5. TST Kinetics (Bond Exchange Rate)¶
5.1 Thermal BER Rate (Arrhenius)¶
k_BER_0 = nu_0 * exp(-E_a / (R*T))
5.2 Stress-Coupled BER Rate (TST)¶
k_BER = k_BER_0 * cosh(V_act * sigma_VM^E / (R*T))
where sigma_VM^E is the von Mises equivalent stress on the E-network:
sigma_VM = sqrt(sigma_xx^2 + sigma_yy^2 - sigma_xx*sigma_yy + 3*sigma_xy^2)
5.3 Stretch-Coupled BER Rate¶
k_BER = k_BER_0 * cosh(V_act * G_E * delta_stretch / (R*T))
where delta_stretch = sqrt(tr(mu^E - mu^E_nat) / dim).
6. Parameter Definitions and Physical Meaning¶
Parameter |
Symbol |
Units |
Default |
Physical Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
G_P |
G_P |
Pa |
1e4 |
Permanent network modulus. Proportional to covalent crosslink density: c_P = G_P/(k_B*T) |
G_E |
G_E |
Pa |
1e4 |
Exchangeable network modulus. Proportional to exchangeable crosslink density |
G_D |
G_D |
Pa |
1e3 |
Dissociative network modulus. Proportional to physical bond density |
nu_0 |
nu_0 |
1/s |
1e10 |
TST attempt frequency. ~10^8-10^12 for small-molecule bond rearrangements |
E_a |
E_a |
J/mol |
80e3 |
Activation energy for bond exchange reaction. Typical: 40-150 kJ/mol |
V_act |
V_act |
m^3/mol |
1e-5 |
Activation volume. Controls mechanochemical coupling (stress-accelerated exchange) |
T |
T |
K |
300 |
Absolute temperature |
k_d^D |
k_d_D |
1/s |
1.0 |
Dissociative bond breakage rate |
Gamma_0 |
Gamma_0 |
1/s |
1e-4 |
Damage rate coefficient (optional) |
lambda_crit |
lambda_crit |
– |
2.0 |
Critical stretch for damage onset (optional) |
Derived quantities:¶
k_BER_0 = nu_0 * exp(-E_a/(R*T)) – thermal BER rate at zero stress
tau_E_eff = 1/(2*k_BER_0) – effective vitrimer relaxation time
tau_D = 1/k_d^D – dissociative relaxation time
eta_D = G_D/k_d^D – dissociative viscosity
f_E = G_E/(G_P + G_E + G_D) – exchange fraction
T_v = topology freezing temperature (where k_BER_0 * tau_obs ~ 1)
7. How Permanent + Dynamic Crosslinks Combine (Vitrimer Behavior)¶
Key physics: Evolving natural-state tensor¶
In conventional transient networks (Maxwell, VLB), broken bonds reform at the equilibrium (stress-free) configuration, so the natural state is always the identity tensor I.
In vitrimers, associative bond exchange rearranges network topology without breaking the network. Bonds that exchange reform in the current deformed configuration, not at equilibrium. This means the stress-free reference state continuously evolves:
d(mu^E_nat)/dt = k_BER * (mu^E - mu^E_nat)
Consequences:
Stress relaxation to zero: Under fixed deformation, mu^E and mu^E_nat both converge to the same tensor, so sigma_E -> 0. The E-network “forgets” its original shape.
Permanent elastic memory: The P-network (G_P) never relaxes, providing a permanent elastic restoring force. This gives vitrimers their unique combination of reprocessability (via BER) and dimensional stability (via permanent crosslinks).
Two-timescale relaxation: G(t) shows a bi-exponential decay to a permanent plateau:
Fast: D-network relaxes at tau_D
Intermediate: E-network relaxes at tau_E_eff = 1/(2*k_BER_0)
Permanent: G_P plateau
Temperature-controlled reprocessability: Below T_v, BER is frozen (k_BER ~ 0) and the material behaves as a thermoset. Above T_v, BER is active and the material can be reprocessed. The transition is controlled by the Arrhenius activation energy E_a.
Limiting cases:¶
G_P >> G_E, G_D: Thermoset (permanent network dominates)
G_E >> G_P, G_D: Pure vitrimer (fully exchangeable)
G_D >> G_P, G_E: Maxwell fluid (dissociative bonds dominate)
G_P ~ G_E, G_D = 0: Partial vitrimer (Meng 2019 Zener model)
All comparable: Full HVM with three relaxation mechanisms
8. Comparison: Vitrimer vs Conventional Transient Network¶
Feature |
VLB / TNT (Conventional) |
HVM (Vitrimer) |
|---|---|---|
Natural state |
Fixed (I) |
Evolving (mu^E_nat) |
Steady-state stress |
sigma = eta * gamma_dot |
sigma_E = 0 (BER erases E-stress) |
Permanent memory |
None (fully relaxes) |
G_P plateau preserved |
Relaxation form |
Single exponential |
Bi-exponential + plateau |
Bond exchange |
Dissociative (network breaks) |
Associative (topology changes, network intact) |
Temperature dependence |
k_d ~ T (simple) |
Arrhenius k_BER ~ exp(-E_a/RT) (TST) |